Legal Opinion

Boyle Valve Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 10, 1930No. K — 66PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this suit February 27, 1929, to recover $3,666.29, excise tax, with interest. Tbe defendant demurs to the petition upon tbe ground that tbe facts set forth in tbe petition do not state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of this court, under section 424 of the Revenue Act of 1928 (45 Stat. 866).

During the years 1923 to 1926, inclusive, plaintiff manufactured and sold valves of various sizes adaptable to and used in many different kinds of machinery. The tax in question was collected under section 903, Revenue Act of 1921, and section 603, Revenue…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Martin's Auto Trimming, Inc., a Corporation v. Robert A. Riddell, Director of Internal Revenue Service and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Fleming v. ReineckeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. McMillan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  5. Routzahn v. Willard Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API