Legal Opinion
State v. Hirsch
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1994No. S-92-611PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
I. STATEMENT OF CASE
Following the overruling of the demurrer filed by the defendant-appellant, Daniel Orlin Hirsch, Sr., on the ground that the charge was time barred, the district court, pursuant to verdict, adjudged Hirsch guilty of committing first degree sexual assault on his daughter, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-319 (Reissue 1989). Hirsch appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals and assigned as errors the district court’s failure to (1) sustain his demurrer, (2) grant his motion for a directed verdict, and (3) order a new trial because of the discovery of new evidence. The…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska Ex Rel. OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. KonfrstNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.