Brants v. Foster
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ULRICH, Judge.
Enlightened Reading, Inc. (Enlightened) and Rhonda Brants appeal the order of the trial court dated February 23, 1995, setting aside a default judgment in their favor and against Kenneth Foster and Jean Moore. They assert that Respondents’ Rule 74.05(c) motion to set aside the default judgment neither stated good cause for Respondents’ failure to answer, nor did it set forth a meritorious defense as the rule requires.
The order of the trial court is reversed.
This litigation stems from business dealings involving Enlightened and Mr. Foster. They, along with Harry Harrison, formed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WilburnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- McClelland v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Vandergriff v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Magee v. MageeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rice v. RiceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- H.J.I. ex rel. J.M.I. v. M.E.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Crain v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Stradford v. CaudilloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State ex rel. Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.