Legal Opinion

Stradford v. Caudillo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1998No. WD 54716PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

Vickey Caudillo appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the default judgment against her pursuant to Rule 74.05 V.A.M.R. Caudillo raises two points on appeal. First, she contends that the trial court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on her motion. Second, she contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion because she showed good cause and she had a meritorious defense.

Affirmed.

Facts

On July 12, 1995, Vickey Caudillo lost control of her car when she slammed on her brakes trying to avoid cars in front of her. When she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WilburnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Myers v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Bredeman v. EnoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Robson v. WillersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Brants v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Sears v. Dent Wizard International Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. JE Scheidegger Co., Inc. v. ManonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Thomas Plasmeier v. Richard J. George, Jr.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Willman v. WallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API