Legal Opinion

EnviroGas, L.P. v. Cedar Rapids/Linn County Solid Waste Agency

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 3, 2002No. 99-1672PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The primary issue we decide in this case is whether appellant, Bluestem Solid Waste Agency, an entity created under Iowa Code chapter 28E (1995), must comply with the competitive bidding requirements of Iowa Code chapter 384. The trial court ruled that Bluestem was subject to the public bidding law and that its failure to comply with that law rendered an agreement between Bluestem and appel-lee, EnviroGas, L.P., unenforceable. Although the court denied any contractual recovery to EnviroGas, the court awarded damages to EnviroGas under a theory of fraud based on representations…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Sime Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. State v. MannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Soo Line Railroad v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Voss v. State, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Falczynski v. Amoco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. NevadaCare, Inc. v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. State of Iowa v. Erik Milton ChildsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Blackford v. Prairie Meadows Racetrack & Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. Duck Creek Tire Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, and Midwest Mexican Connection, LTD., an Iowa Corporation v. Goodyear Corners, L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  5. In the Interest of M.W. and Z.W., Minor Children, R.W., MotherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API