Legal Opinion

Woodmen Investment Ass'n v. Grand Junction

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1911No. 6583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Mesa District Court — Hon. Sprigg Shackleford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

On February 5th, 1908, by proceedings on certiorari the plaintiff in error, as relator, commenced this action in the lower court against the defendants in error, as respondents, to have declared null and void and of no effect, t woliquor licenses issued June 13th, 1907, and September 10th, 1907, to W. A. Lynch and Company for the sale of intoxicating liquors in the City of Grand Junction. The petition discloses that each license was for a period of six months, both of which have long since expired. The principal questions sought to be reviewed are questions of facts which may never arise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Floyd v. CochranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  2. Knowles v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Hunter v. DickinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. State Board of Equalization v. People ex rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burns v. National Mining, Tunnel & Land Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Wolfe v. BauerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Burns v. National Mining, Tunnel & Land Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API