Lundeen v. Mineta
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WIENER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Daniel N. Lundeen appeals from the jurisdictional dismissal of his suit against Defendants-Appellees Norman Y. Mineta, the Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation (“USDOT”) 1 ; the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (“Metro”); and the City of Houston (“Houston”). Agreeing with the district court’s conclusion that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction of this case, we affirm its dismissal of Lundeen’s action.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
This suit was brought by a bicyclist opposed to a federally funded highway project…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Paulsson Geophysical Services, Inc. v. SigmarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Bissonnet Investments LLC v. Quinlan (In Re Bissonnet Investments LLC)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Fei Bian v. Hillary ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Inter-Coastal Xpress, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Casas v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.