Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 25, 1991PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, J.

In this capital case the State does not disagree that the death sentence must be vacated. Point XIII of the State’s brief summarizes the point:

Defendant contends that the trial court's charge during the penalty phase with respect to the jury’s consideration of mitigating factors was erroneous in that it required the jury to unanimously find an alleged mitigating factor before it could be considered. The State is constrained to agree that the court’s charge with respect to the need for juror unanimity before finding the existence of a…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State v. PrecioseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain Sr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. State v. MartiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. State v. MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API