Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Vizelich
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1932No. Docket Nos. 4629, 4630PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
Two appeals arising out of this estate have been combined upon this appeal. The first is from an order settling a first account in the estate, and the second is from an order denying a motion to set aside the decree of distribution made therein.
The decedent, Nellie Harding Vizelich, died testate in the year 1918, leaving six children, Amelia, Kate, Nellie, Nicholas,- Henry and Stanley, surviving her. During the course of administration Nicholas, Amelia (Amelia Bruce) and Stanley died. The will was duly admitted to probate. Under its terms decedent directed that her real…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ingrim v. EppersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Witherspoon v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Estate of BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Kammerer v. MarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Scheimer v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Fallon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Carroll v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of BarnhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.