Mitchell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is recognized that a person may- be adopted as a member of an Indian tribe according to the customs of the Indians, and that such adoption, if approved by the Interior Department, vests in the person adopted a right to an allotment of land that may be subject to be allotted to the Indians of the tribe. But to make the adoption into the tribe effective, so as to entitle the one adopted to obtain an allotment, there must be something more than the vote of the tribe or of its council of head men in favor of adoption.
The statute under which allotments are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sunderland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States Ex Rel. West v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- La Clair v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe of Southern Ute ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Martinez v. Southern Ute TribeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- St. Marie v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Wise v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. ProvoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.