Legal Opinion

People v. Galan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 2009No. B209903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

A trial is a search for the truth. Cross-examination and impeachment of witnesses go to the truth-seeking function of the trial. The courts should be ever vigilant to allow both sides access to evidentiary material that will enable them to search for the truth. In an appropriate case, these principles allow a criminal defendant, by way of a Pitchess motion, to “fish” in a police officer’s personnel records to see if the officer has a penchant to commit some type of misconduct that would aid in the search for truth. (Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. MoocCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Warrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  2. Frazier v. Ulta Beauty Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. In re M.C.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Julian III Flores v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. People v. Compton CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API