People v. Mooc
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d
531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305] (Pitchess), we recognized that a criminal defendant may, in some circumstances, compel the discovery of evidence in the arresting law enforcement officer’s personnel file that is relevant to the defendant’s ability to defend against a criminal charge. “In 1978, the California Legislature codified the privileges and procedures surrounding what had come to be known as ‘Pitchess motions’ . . . through the enactment of Penal Code sections 832.7 and 832.8 and Evidence Code sections 1043 through…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by216 opinions
- People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. YearwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Alford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.