Legal Opinion

Yeo v. PIG & WHISTLE SANDWICH SHOPS INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1950No. 33034Published

1Opinion of the Court

83 Ga. App. 91 (1950)

62 S.E.2d 668

YEO

v.

THE PIG AND WHISTLE SANDWICH SHOPS INC.

33034.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided December 4, 1950.

Rehearing Denied December 20, 1950.

Miller & Head, for plaintiff.

Moise, Post & Gardner, for defendant.

MacINTYRE, P. J.

1. Let us say from the beginning that, from a consideration of the allegations of the petition, we do not construe the petition as having been brought upon the theory that negligence per se is shown by a violation of the Pure Food Law (Code, § 42-101 et seq.) See, in that connection, Donaldson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 186 Ga. 870…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pacetti v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Donaldson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Armour & Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. McPherson v. Capuano & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Rowe v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API