United States v. Kohut
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REED, Senior Judge:
In this case we hold that a convening authority’s failure to obtain prior approval from the Judge Advocate General [JAG] to refer offenses, which had been adjudicated in state judicial proceedings, to a court-martial is not a jurisdictional bar to trial by court-martial, even though such approval is required by Department of the Navy regulations. See Manual of the Judge Advocate General [JAGMAN], JAGINST 5800.7C of 6 Aug 1992, § 0124a. Put in a slightly different manner, a court-martial convened by such a commander does not lack jurisdiction to try such offenses.
BACKGROUND
Th…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. SloanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. KohutCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996