Legal Opinion

United States v. Kohut

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 29, 1994No. NMCM 93 01829PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Senior Judge:

In this case we hold that a convening authority’s failure to obtain prior approval from the Judge Advocate General [JAG] to refer offenses, which had been adjudicated in state judicial proceedings, to a court-martial is not a jurisdictional bar to trial by court-martial, even though such approval is required by Department of the Navy regulations. See Manual of the Judge Advocate General [JAGMAN], JAGINST 5800.7C of 6 Aug 1992, § 0124a. Put in a slightly different manner, a court-martial convened by such a commander does not lack jurisdiction to try such offenses.

BACKGROUND

Th…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. SloanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. KohutCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API