Legal Opinion

McElrath v. Electric Investments Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1911No. Nos. 17,009 — (108)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $3,-780 for fraudulent statements alleged to have been made for the purpose of inducing plaintiffs to enter into a lease of certain property. From an order, Dickinson, J\, overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, it appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appeal from an order overruling a general demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint. It appears from the complaint that the defendant was *359the owner of a certain summer hotel property, including the land upon which the building.was situated, and certain personal property used in connection with the operation of the hotel, situated at Antlers Park, in Dakota county. On April 15, 1909, the parties to the action entered into a contract by the terms of which defendant leased the property to plaintiffs for a term of years. The terms and conditions of the lease were fully set forth in the written contract,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Williams v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Albitz v. Minneapolis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Haarstad v. GatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cofield v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Rochester Civic Theatre, Inc. v. Maria RamsayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  3. Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Rosenquist v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API