The Hanna Mining Company, a Delaware Corporation v. The Escanaba and Lake Superior Railroad Company, a Michigan Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Circuit Judge.
The underlying issue in this appeal is the extent to which, if any, rate-setting agreements between a carrier and a shipper, entered into prior to October 1,1980, are to be enforced in either state or federal court. Resolving this question requires this court to discuss the jurisdiction and authority of the Interstate Commerce Commission and the courts, both before and after the enactment of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, Pub.L.No. 96-448, 94 Stat. 1895. 49 U.S. C.A. § 10101 et seq. (1981 pamphlet), in the field of regulating railroad freight rates.
Hanna Mining Company…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Iowa Power & Light Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company and Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Transkentucky Transportation Railroad v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1983
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Kentucky Utilities Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.