Legal Opinion

Moorehead v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 12, 1998No. 24742PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

On advice of counsel, respondent pled guilty to two separate charges arising from different facts: criminal sexual conduct (CSC) third degree and unlawful use of telephone. No direct appeal was taken. We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review the grant of post-conviction relief (PCR) and now reverse.

FACTS

The following facts were presented at the plea hearing by the assistant solicitor:

Your Honor, as to the unlawful use of telephone, [respondent] called the victim, who is his ex, who is his ex-girlfriend, and harassed and threatened her. One call was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Kibler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Satterwhite v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Knox v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Rollison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Lorenzen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Holden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API