Moorehead v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
On advice of counsel, respondent pled guilty to two separate charges arising from different facts: criminal sexual conduct (CSC) third degree and unlawful use of telephone. No direct appeal was taken. We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review the grant of post-conviction relief (PCR) and now reverse.
FACTS
The following facts were presented at the plea hearing by the assistant solicitor:
Your Honor, as to the unlawful use of telephone, [respondent] called the victim, who is his ex, who is his ex-girlfriend, and harassed and threatened her. One call was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wolfe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Kibler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Satterwhite v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
3Cited by13 opinions
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Knox v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Rollison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Lorenzen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Holden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.