Legal Opinion · Dissent

Calaway v. State Bar of California

California Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1986No. L.A. 32090Published

1DissentBird, C. J.

I respectfully dissent.

My colleagues dismiss, in a few short sentences, the significance of petitioner’s failure to mention in his application for reinstatement the highly unfavorable finding of fraud the federal district court made in the third party insurance proceeding in Yale v. Calaway. When that finding is examined in conjunction with the other evidence presented at the hearing, the conclusion is inescapable that petitioner has not discharged his heavy burden of demonstrating present fitness to practice law and character worthy of readmission that our cases require. For this reason, I…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Tardiff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Feinstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Roth v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API