Legal Opinion
United States v. Bond
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 2009No. 06-50628PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the government withheld Brady information from a defendant in a wire fraud prosecution arising out of an electric power sales scheme in the deregulated California market. 1
I
In 1998, California deregulated its electricity industry, which, at the time, consisted of three major companies: Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas & Electric. Although these utilities continued to transmit and to distribute electricity, after deregulation California customers could choose to buy their power from the regional supplier, or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wright v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Gary Benn v. John Lambert, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Richard AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Jerry J. Enomoto, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Randall Amado v. Terri GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- State v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. Super. Ct. (Johnson)California Supreme Court · 2015
- HRPT PROPERTIES TRUST v. LingleDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Randall Amado v. Terri GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.