Graham v. National Bank
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
charging the jury:
The plaintiff contends:
1st. That the Jones check for $700.00 was collected by the defendant bank;
2d. That even if the defendant bank did not collect said check it was estopped to deny that it had collected it.
The defendant denies that it collected said check or that the law of estoppel applies.
It is admitted by the plaintiff that the check was deposited in the defendant bank for collection. Where money is deposited in a bank the relation of debtor and creditor arises, and the bank, like any other debtor, owes the depositor the amount of its deposit. National…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Midland National Bank of Kansas City v. BrightwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Jefferson County Savings Bank v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- National Dredging Co. v. PresidentSupreme Court of Delaware · 1908
- National Revere Bank v. National Bank of Republic of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Marvel v. OrtlipCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1866
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. WSMW Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
- Superior Tube Co. v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
- Clauson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961
- Wolf v. Globe Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Colvocoresses v. W. S. Wasserman Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.