Legal Opinion
Spic & Span, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 25, 1996No. 95-1572, 95-1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.
Spic and Span, Inc., appeals from the judgments and order granting summary judg ment in favor of its insurers, Continental Casualty Co., American Casualty Co., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., and Northwestern National Insurance Co. The trial court concluded that, under City of Edgerton v. General Casualty Co., 184 Wis. 2d 750, 517 N.W.2d 463 (1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1360 (1995) and cert. denied sub. nom., 115 S. Ct. 2615 (1995), the insurers did not have a duty to defend or indemnify Spic and Span in an underlying federal suit. Spic and Span also challenges the trial court's…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Grube v. DaunCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Shorewood School Dist. v. Wausau Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Edgerton v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Wisconsin Power & Light Company v. Century Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Affiliated FM InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Regent Insurance Co. v. City of ManitowocCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.