Legal Opinion

Kandala v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1985No. Appeal, No. 2869 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Joseph Gr. Kandala (claimant) appeals here an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision holding that he was not “unemployed” as that term is defined in Section 4(u) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §753(u).

On May 27, 1982, the Hempfield School District (employer) notified the claimant, who worked as a tenured, permanent, full-time teacher, that he was being furloughed for the 1982-1983 school term due to *201declining pnpil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hyduchak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Partridge v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Holets v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gusky v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. McCann v. Reynolds School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1989
  3. Zerby v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Zerby v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API