Legal Opinion

Holets v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1978No. Appeal, No. 812 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Bertha D. Holets (claimant) appeals from a decision by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming a referee’s determination that claimant was not eligible for unemployment compensation benefits, because she was not unemployed as defined in the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law),1 Section 4(u), 43 P.S. §753(u), and had therefore received benefits for which she was not eligible, benefits which must therefore be recouped according to Section 804(b) of the Law, 43 P.S. §874(b), dealing with non-fault overpayments. We affirm.

Claimant was employed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Chickey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Hyduchak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Partridge v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Hale v. Cullman County Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Kandala v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Penn Hills School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Sude v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API