Legal Opinion

Ex parte Lewkowitz

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided August 14, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, District Judge.

This is a writ of habeas corpus to obtain a minor’s discharge from the army. The petition alleges that the petitioner’s son is 18 years old and that he enlisted without his father’s consent. The return admits the son’s minority and„his enlistment without his father’s consent. It then alleges that when he enlisted he represented himself to be upwards of 21 years of age; that after enlistment, and before August 1, 1908, the date when the petition for the writ of habeas corpus was verified, he received allowances from the supply department of the United States army; that on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re MorrisseySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. In re MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
  3. In re CarverU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1900
  4. In re ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  5. Ex parte HoughtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex parte HubbardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1910
  2. Ex parte DunakinDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1913
  3. United States ex rel. Laikund v. WillifordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  4. Hoskins v. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  5. United States ex rel. Hendricks v. PendletonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API