Legal Opinion

In re Miller

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1902No. 1,140PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas.

1Opinion of the Court

SHELBY, Circuit Judge.

Daniel Marshall Miller enlisted in the United States army on July 26, 1901, as a private soldier, at Austin, Tex. He represented himself to be 21 years of age, when in fact he was only about 17. His parents were both living, and were citizens of Texas, residing in Hill county, in that state. They did not consent to his enlistment. He was transferred from Austin, Tex., and attached to the 105th company, coast artillery. He received from the government $15.02 pay as a private soldier, and drew clothing from the government of the value of $35.36. He deserted on September…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Smith v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. In Re MorrisseySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. McConologue's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gibson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States v. ReavesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903
  4. Dillingham v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
  5. In re ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API