Edwards v. State

SAMFORD, Judge.

The trial was had before the judge sitting without a jury. There were many objections and exceptions to introduction of evidence. Some of these rulings may have constituted technical error, but, eliminating all of the questionable testimony, the remaining evidence is without conflict and sufficient to support the judgment. The rule in such cases is : “Where a case is tried by a judge without a jury, the admission o'f illegal evidence raises the presumption of injury, just as in cases tried before a jury, and requires the reversal of the judgment, unless the remaining evidence…