Legal Opinion

Deal v. Houston County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 18, 1918No. 4 Div. 778PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Houston County ; H. A. Pearce, Judge. Suit by L. S. Deal against Houston County. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed. Transferred from the Court of Appeals under Act April 18, 1911 (Laws 1911, p. 450), § 6.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was based on an itemized, verified account, under the statute. Code, § 3970. The general issue only was pleaded. The judgment hy the court, trying without a jury, was for the defendant.

[1] Counsel overlook the construction which has been given the act of September 25, 1915 (Gen. Acts, p. 824) — Ahlrichs v. Rollo, 76 South. 37; Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403, 72 South. 52; Finney v. Studebaker Corporation of Amer., 196 Ala. 422, 72 South. 54— to the effect that where the evidence adduced before the judge trying without a jury was developed ore tenus, or partly so, the finding of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The Floyd AcceptancesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Lee v. MunroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Springer v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Union Central Life Ins. v. State Ex Rel. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Pigford v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. McSwean v. McSweanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API