Kirtland v. State

SAMFORD, Judge.

The State introduced testimony which tended to prove the finding of a quantity of beer and a small amount of whisky in the place of business of defendant, at which time and place the defendant was present.

There are numerous objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence, which, as we are required to do by statute, we have examined and in none of them do we find questions of merit presented.

A charge of illegally possessing prohibited liquors can be sustained by circumstantial evidence just as any other material fact in establishing a criminal charge. Walker v. State,…