Legal Opinion

Ernest E. Frankenberg v. Southern Railway Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1970No. 19566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCREE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Southern Railway Company appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict of $10,000 in a personal injury action. The sole issue is whether plaintiff-appellee, as a matter of law, was barred from recovery by contributory negligence. Federal jurisdiction exists because of diversity of citizenship, and Tennessee law applies.

The accident out of which this litigation arises occurred when appellee Fran-kenberg’s automobile collided with a train at a railroad crossing in Bulls Gap, Tennessee, at about 2 a. m. on November 24, 1967. Approximately a half hour before,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
  2. Standridge v. GodseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Strickland Transp. Co. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  4. Tiffany v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  5. Adams v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monte Kay Perry v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Ernestine Reid and Walter Reid v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  3. Kevin Thomas and Cecelia Thomas v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API