Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 16, 1963No. Civ. A. 4214, 4330, 4395PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.

These cases, three in number, are actions to recover damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act, Title 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) 1 and Section 2674.

The Act makes the Government liable “respecting * * * tort claims * * * in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances.” 28 U.S.C. § 2674. Discretionary functions or duties are excepted.. § 2680(a). 2

The Government, through the Atomic-Energy Commission, hereinafter some times called AEC, is engaged in a program of production and development of atomic energy at Oak Eidge, Tennessee.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. United States v. HullCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  4. Shell Oil Company v. BlanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  5. Pierce v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Clifford Gowdy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  2. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Latham v. Technar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
  4. Carl C. Womble v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. Krumback v. Dow Chemical Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API