Frankfurth v. Anderson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Taylor County. Actions to recover the purchase price of goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant. The facts sufficiently appear from, the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
In each of the above-entitled cases there is an appeal from the order of the circuit court refusing to set aside the judgments entered therein against the appellant. The judgments were entered by the clerk of the court, upon default of the defendant and without any appearance on bis part.
The grounds upon which the appellant moved to set aside the judgments are the following: (1) that the complaint filed in the several actions does not state a cause of action; (2) that the complaints were not properly verified, and the clerk entered judgment without taking any proof of the plaintiffs’ claims…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dodge v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Ætna Life Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
- Lyman v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Wanzer v. HowlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Tallman v. McCartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wisconsin Public Service Corp. v. KristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Chivers v. Board of Com'rs of Johnston CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Einstein's Sons & Leffler v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Lange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.