Legal Opinion
Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 4, 2007No. 05-35627, 05-35640, 05-36153, 05-36202PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
McKenzie-Willamette Hospital (“McKenzie”) filed a complaint in the district court against PeaceHealth asserting seven claims for relief. Five of the claims arose under the federal antitrust laws: monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy to monopolize, tying, and exclusive dealing. The other two claims arose under Oregon state law: price discrimination and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage.
Before trial, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Peace-Health on McKenzie’s tying claim. After a two-and-a-half-week trial,…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Churchill v. Winter Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Masimo Corp. v. Tyco Health Care Group, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Masimo Corp. v. Tyco Health Care Group, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009