Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Masimo Corp. v. Tyco Health Care Group, L.P.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 2009No. Nos. 07-55960, 07-56017Published

1Concurring in the judgmentBea, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result, and with the majority’s reasoning except for the way in which the majority affirms the district court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) to Tyco on Masimo’s bundling claim.

I agree that bundled discounts are not per se illegal so long as, after applying the discount-attribution test, the discounted price is above cost. Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth, 502 F.3d 895 (9th Cir.2007), amended 515 F.3d 883 (9th Cir.2008). I also think that Tyco’s “bundled discounts” were multi-product market-*99share discounts, because a condition of obtaining such “bundled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API