Legal Opinion

Lybrand v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 1979No. CA 79-52PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ernie E. Wright, Chief Judge.

This appeal of a Workers’ Compensation case to the Arkansas Supreme Court has been assigned to the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 29(3).

The administrative law judge found that Howard Lybrand, appellant, did not sustain an injury arising out of and in the course of the employment with the appellee. The full Commission and the circuit court agreed.

The records show appellant, age 64, had worked for respondent for 36 years. He had driven a truck, a dozer and a front-end loader. Prior to the incident out of which the claim arose, he was hospitalized in October, 1976…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Turner v. Lambert Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Allied Telephone Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jeter v. B.R. McGinty MechanicalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. City of Fayetteville v. GuessCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Bates v. Frost Logging Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. ITT/Higbie Manufacturing v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Stephenson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API