Legal Opinion
Port of Seattle v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2007No. 03-74139, 03-74472, 03-74769, 04-70110, 04-70185, 04-70703, 04-71189PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge THOMAS; Concurrence by Judge McKEOWN.
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
This is another in a series of cases arising out of the energy crisis that occurred in California and other western states in 2000 and 2001. We are asked to review the decision by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) to deny refunds to wholesale buyers of electricity that purchased energy in the short-term supply market at unusually high prices in the Pacific Northwest. We are also asked to review FERC’s decision to exclude from any potential refund those transactions involving energy…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- California Department of Water Resources v. Powerex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Redding Rancheria v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- City of Redding v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.