Legal Opinion
Dorbest Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 9, 2011No. Consol. 05-00003PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
POGUE, Chief Judge.
In prior proceedings in this matter, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) held that when calculating surrogate labor rates for the valuation of goods from a nonmarket economy (“NME”), the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) must use data from countries that are both economically comparable to the NME and significant producers of comparable merchandise. Dorbest Ltd. v. United States, 604 F.3d 1363, 1372-73 (Fed.Cir.2010)(“Dorbest IV”). Dorbest IV thus required Commerce to redetermine, on remand, the labor rate applicable here. See Final…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Camau Frozen Seafood Processing Import Export Corp v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.