Legal Opinion

Salvi v. John A. Manning Paper Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

Each of the defendants except the Hygienic Ice Company moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the facts stated are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. Upon this motion the complaint must be construed liberally and the facts pleaded given every fair intendment and the benefit of every fair inference in support of the pleading.

The first requisite for the enforcement of an affirmative covenant running with the land against a subsequent purchaser is that “ it must appear that the grantor and grantee intended that the covenant should run with the land.” (Neponsit Property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Allen v. CulverNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Miller v. . ClaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Mygatt v. . CoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 165 Broadway Building, Inc. v. City Investing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Arroyo v. RosenbluthCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  3. 165 Broadway Building, Inc. v. City Investing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API