165 Broadway Building, Inc. v. City Investing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
On December 3, 1907, the Interborough Rapid Transit Company, operator of the Sixth Avenue Elevated Railroad in New York City, entered into a formal covenant, which is the subject matter of the controversy herein, with Broadway-Cortlandt Company, the owner of a building then in process of construction, at the southeast corner of Church and Cortlandt Streets and extending through to Broadway, now known as the 165 Broadway Building, in that city. The covenant stated that the owner desired the Railway Company to construct and maintain certain bridges, passageways, and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Cole v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Miller v. . ClaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Norcross v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Nicholson v. 300 Broadway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Vetzel v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Gallagher v. BellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.