Legal Opinion
Arroyo v. Rosenbluth
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided August 17, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
Herbert Kramer, J.
This action was begun in the housing court to restore three tenants to occupancy of a substantially fire damaged premises and to compel the landlord to do the work therefor.
The landlords’ attorney stipulated on behalf of his clients to restore the premises within 90 days, which stipulation was so ordered by this court. Subsequently, the landlord entered into a contract for the sale of the premises with Bruce Marlow. Within the 90-day restoration period, Mar-low took title to the premises. The deed provided that the premises was subject “to a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Matter of Spector v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Smith v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Beach v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doo Soon Chung v. Doo Nam KimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Lex Pro Corp. v. Snyder Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Bing Chung Chan v. 60 Eldridge Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Arroyo v. MarlowNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Mark v. William Muschel, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.