Legal Opinion

Gitomer v. United States Casualty Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 24, 1947No. Docket 158/316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This matter comes before the court on the return of an order to show cause why the defendant should not be restrained from prosecuting and asserting a defense heretofore made in an action at law and a motion by the defendant to strike the bill herein filed. The pertinent facts as elicited from the bill of complaint are as follows:

On June 15th, 1946, the complainants, upon the payment of the required premium to an agent of defendant, one Robert C. Altman, obtained a policy from the United States Casualty Company insuring them against certain stated losses by burglarly, larceny or theft, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Downs v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. La Rosa ex rel. La Rosa v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  4. Capraro v. PropatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  5. Township of Ewing v. TrentonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. N. Rothenberg & Son, Inc. v. NakoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. McLaughlin v. City of MillvilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API