Legal Opinion

In Re Smith

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 30, 1929No. Patent Appeal 2192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office, affirming the action of the examiner in rejecting all of appellant’s claims, five in number, for a patent upon 'certain equipment for billing typewriting machines.

Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims here in issue, and reads as follows: “In the art of magazines for selectively supplying and feeding continuous webs containing work-forms to continuous billing typewriting machines equipped with carbon-sheet frames, a magazine provided with banks of holders for continuous - work-webs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of Robert J. HarryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  2. Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. Kingsland, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Heger Products Co. v. Polk Miller Products CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. In Re Germantown Trust Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  5. Application of WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API