Legal Opinion

In Re Germantown Trust Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 11, 1932No. Patent Appeal 3008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Examiner refusing to allow claims .1 to 9, inclusive, of an application for patent upon alleged improvements in fuel gauges of the type used for indicating the quantity of fuel in the tank of a motor vehicle, the indicating instrument being remote from tho tank.

All are combination claims. We quote 1 and 9 :

“I. In a fuel gauge for automobiles, the combination of a pressure-responsive part adapted to bo attached to the fuel tank, said part having a diaphragm positioned to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Langan v. Warren Axe & Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  2. In Re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. In Re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  3. In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  4. J. S. Thorn Co. v. Michael Flynn Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Modern Food Process Co. v. Chester Packing & Provision Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API