Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 20, 2014No. CASE NO. 1:05-CV-1276PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 154]
JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
In this qui tam case, Plaintiff-Relator Harry Barko disputes the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product claims made by Defendants Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., KBR Technical Services, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Engineering Corporation, Kellogg, Brown & Root International, Inc., and Halliburton Company (collectively “KBR”) regarding certain documents.
KBR has submitted these documents along with three privilege logs for in camera review. The first privilege log deals with Code of Business Conduct…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Associates, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States ex rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Mark Anderson, Plaintiff v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, DefendantDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Anderson v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.