Legal Opinion
Losee v. Hettich
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1952No. File 9252Published
1Opinion of the Court
54 N.W.2d 353 (1952)
LOSEE et al.
v.
HETTICH et al.
No. 9252.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
July 22, 1952.
Rehearing Denied September 30, 1952.
Raymond Hieb, Ipswich, for plaintiffs-appellants.
J. M. Berry, Ipswich, for defendants-respondents.
RUDOLPH, Judge.
Plaintiffs seek to restrain the Board of Supervisors of Montpelier Township from paying for the construction of one mile of township road. The trial court refused the injunction and plaintiffs have appealed. We affirm the judgment.
Defendant supervisors had agreed with an adjoining township that the road in question, which is a boundary between the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bartron v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Miller v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Bechthold v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Parsons v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Farmer v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.