VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZ. v. Foreign Car Rental
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Day.
We will refer to the plaintiff in error as the Bank; to the defendant in error corporation as Car Rental, and to the individual defendants in error as Murphy and Lowell.
The Bank instituted action against Car Rental for $40,000.00 plus interest because of default in the payment of a promissory note in that amount. Murphy and Lowell were made defendants, and judgment was sought against each of them in the amount of $10,000.00 on asserted liability on a “continuing Guaranty” each had executed to enable Car Rental to obtain a line of credit at the Bank.
A trial was had to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGee v. F. W. Poe Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Yama v. SigmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Hazzard v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. GalmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Continental Nat. Bank v. DolanColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Highlands Ranch University Park, LLC v. Uno of Highlands Ranch, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. Colcott Partners IVColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. WarnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.