Legal Opinion

VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZ. v. Foreign Car Rental

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 19, 1965No. 20708PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

We will refer to the plaintiff in error as the Bank; to the defendant in error corporation as Car Rental, and to the individual defendants in error as Murphy and Lowell.

The Bank instituted action against Car Rental for $40,000.00 plus interest because of default in the payment of a promissory note in that amount. Murphy and Lowell were made defendants, and judgment was sought against each of them in the amount of $10,000.00 on asserted liability on a “continuing Guaranty” each had executed to enable Car Rental to obtain a line of credit at the Bank.

A trial was had to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGee v. F. W. Poe Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Yama v. SigmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Hazzard v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. GalmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Continental Nat. Bank v. DolanColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Highlands Ranch University Park, LLC v. Uno of Highlands Ranch, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. Colcott Partners IVColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. WarnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API