Legal Opinion

Hazzard v. General Tire & Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 19, 1937No. 27404PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

R. M. Ingram was in the retail tire business. 1-Ie had been buying the tires which he sold to the public from the plaintiff, General Tire & Rubber Company, on open account. He was told by the representatives of that company that if he would obtain a written guaranty of payment, the company would extend him a larger credit. Accordingly, his sister-in-law, defendant, executed to the company her written guaranty, wherein she guaranteed payment of 'all bills or indebtedness due or to become due, including payment of future notes, except that she limited her liability to $2,500. Several months…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rucker v. Republic Supply CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Ford Motor Credit Company v. R. Kenneth Milburn and Jane B. Milburn, Husband and Wife and Bobby J. Rogers and Marilyn A. Rogers, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZ. v. Foreign Car RentalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Rabon v. PutnamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  5. In Re HentgesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API