Legal Opinion

Dotson v. Dotson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1895No. 1,736PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The first assignment of error discussed by-counsel is that ‘ ‘ the amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. ”

When the sufficiency of a complaint is called in question for the first time in this court the defect in the complaint will 'be deemed to be cured by the verdict, unless it wholly omits the averment of some material facts essential to the cause of action attempted to be stated. In such case, if the omitted fact is such as can be inferred by reasonable intendment from the other facts alleged, and the other facts expressly stated in connection…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lockhart v. SchlotterbackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Western Assurance Co. v. KoontzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KeslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. McCreery v. NordykeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API