Legal Opinion

State v. Voetberg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 25, 1989No. 87-1052, 87-1053; CA A51098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*114ROSSMAN, J.

Defendant challenges the restitution ordered after his guilty plea for misapplication of entrusted property. ORS 165.095. He assigns as error the provision of the sentence requiring him to pay restitution to a victim of a crime for which he was originally charged but which was dismissed as a result of a plea agreement.

Defendant and his corporation, Tillamook Insurance Company, were charged in two indictments with three crimes involving two separate victims. In the first indictment, they were charged with theft in the first degree, ORS 164.055, and with misapplication of entrusted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. State v. HullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BlanchardMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Erickson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Greenwood v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API