Legal Opinion

Greenwood v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1996No. 25437Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Phil Greenwood was tried on a charge of battery causing serious bodily harm. He was acquitted of that charge but *409was convicted of the lesser offense of misdemeanor battery. At the conclusion of the criminal trial, the district judge ordered Greenwood to pay Jon Stevens, the injured party, restitution in the amount of $94,000 to cover the costs of all of Stevens’ medical bills.

We conclude that the district court’s order requiring Greenwood to pay restitution for all of Stevens’ medical bills was erroneous.

FACTS

At approximately 11:00 p.m. on July 27, 1993, Stevens went to…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MadrilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Erickson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. VoetbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API