Legal Opinion
Roudnahal v. Ridge
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 3, 2003No. 1:02 CV 02459PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
MATIA, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court upon the defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 48). The defendants move to dismiss the claims against them for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. Background
The plaintiffs are all non-citizens of Arab descent present in the United States. Because of their nationalities and non-citizen status, most of the plaintiffs were…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kandamar v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Imtiaz Ali v. Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- In Re OnStar Contract LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Ali v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.